News, data and conversation
about schools in New York City.
WNYC’s participation is supported by
Explore the News

New Study Identifies 'Opportunity Gap' for Students

7 Comments
Respond

April 17, 2012, 4:02 p.m.

WNYC

Educators have long studied the achievement gap, in which black and Hispanic pupils and low-income students of all races perform at much lower levels than their white, Asian and better-off peers. A new study released on Tuesday by a group that supported efforts to attain more money for city schools looked at the educational opportunities available to poor and minority students and found the choices lacking.

The report by the Schott Foundation for Public Education found that poor and minority students have fewer opportunities to attend the city’s best public schools largely because of where they live.

The study’s authors looked at state math and English scores at 500 middle schools in the 2009-2010 school year. The schools were sorted into four groups from highest to lowest test scores, with an equal number of schools in each. The authors then looked at how many students in each of the city’s 32 community school districts are able to attend local middle schools that scored in the 75th percentile, or top quarter.

The study did not include charter schools. Most of the charters are in low-income and minority communities, and some of them have impressive test scores.

The study found that wealthier neighborhoods have more access to better schools. For example, all of the students in District 26 in Queens — which includes Douglaston and Little Neck — have an opportunity to attend a high-performing middle school. Most students can also attend high-scoring schools in Manhattan’s District 2 and 3.

But in five districts, which include Harlem, the Bronx and Bedford-Stuyvesant, no students can attend a middle school that performs in the top quarter. The local middle schools just don’t have the test scores. The report also found that, within the 32 districts, whites and Asians are more likely to attend high-scoring schools than blacks and Hispanics.

The Schott Foundation helped finance the now defunct Campaign for Fiscal Equity, which won a lawsuit finding New York City’s public schools were shortchanged by the state. It also gives grants to the Alliance for Quality Education and the New York State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P.

The report’s main author, researcher Michael Holzman, called the findings evidence of educational “redlining,” because of the disparities, and said they were “an embarrassment to the city,”

“What we have is a situation where children who are most in need of what New York City public education can offer them are the least-likely to be able to have access to it,” he said.

The report challenges the Bloomberg administration’s argument that it is providing more high quality choices for families by opening about 500 schools in the past decade, including more than a hundred privately managed charter schools.

But by not including the charters, the study failed to take into account the full range of options available to students, especially in the city’s poorest neighborhoods.

Mr. Holzman said charters were not included because they only served only 2 percent of all city students in the 2009-2010 school year, though the percentile is higher in low-income areas.

The study also did not provide any comparison data to previous years to show whether things have gotten better or worse. And it did not say how many students from each district had the opportunity to attend a school in the top 50th to 74th percentile, meaning their scores aren’t in the very top but are still better than average.

Department of Education spokesman Frank Thomas said the city is making progress in closing achievement gaps.

“Over the last ten years, our reforms have focused almost entirely on creating better schools for students who were failed by the system for decades,” he said. “While there is much more work to do, the reality is that black and Hispanic students in New York City are graduating at their highest rates ever, and continue to narrow the achievement gap year after year. A report that fails to acknowledge this progress is shortsighted and overlooks the gains made by thousands of students during that time.”

The Schott study, however, also found evidence of disparity in teacher quality. It found that districts with high poverty rates have fewer experienced and highly educated teachers (those with a masters degree plus 30 additional credits) than wealthier districts, where teachers tend to stay for a long time. The report says the city winds up spending 19 percent more educating students in the wealthier districts because their teachers make more money.

Meanwhile, the same districts that have the lowest performing middle schools also send few children to gifted and talented programs and specialized high schools. This was confirmed in data released last week by the Department of Education finding that so many more children from Manhattan and brownstone Brooklyn qualify for gifted and talented programs than students in low-income neighborhoods such as District 7 of the South Bronx, where fewer than 100 prekindergarten children took the test and only six were eligible.

The Schott Foundation is calling on the city to expand tutoring and test-preparation services so that more students can take the admissions test for specialized high schools. It also wants the city to test all incoming kindergarten students for gifted and talented programs, because so many families in poor communities don’t even have their children tested.

It also proposes a cap on the percentage of new teachers who are allowed to work in high-poverty districts, and for the state to restore and increase aid to New York City.

The Department of Education says testing all pre-K students would result in a significant loss of instructional time because it takes about an hour to test each of these children one-on-one. It has also questioned the logistics of capping the percentage of new teachers working in low-performing districts, which tend to have the most vacancies.

“We are always working to attract the highest quality teachers to our lower performing schools,” said the spokesman, Mr. Thomas, adding that this is the city’s plan for the 26 schools it plans to close and reopen this fall.

Beth Fertig is a senior reporter at WNYC. Follow her on Twitter @bethfertig

7 Comments

Respond
Picture?type=square
Linda Johnson April 18, 2012, 5:08 PM

Poor and minority students have fewer educationalopportunities and resources at home and at school. We've known this for over sixty years and there is a mountain of research to support it. The sooner we accept this, the sooner we'll be able to do something about it.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
George Garrett April 18, 2012, 5:44 PM

Like what will we be able to do about it? If we haven't done anything about it in some of the most prosperous years in history, what will we do about it now the country is in the worst economic condition since the great depression?

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Robert Weissberg April 18, 2012, 6:33 PM

This is absolutely misleading. The problem is not access to "good schools" but the qualities of students. How come when students from poor areas attend "good schools" they still don't perform well? There are countless towns and cities where poor blacks attend first rate schools and their performance is no better than black kids state-wide. Look at Shaker Heights OH. And after school tutoring has been tried under NCLB, and the participation rate was 6%. You cannot overcome low motivation and an anti-intellectual culture.

Fantasies like this only exacerbate the problem. There are far better solutions than shipping poor kids to schools with lots of rich kids. If that worked, forced busing would have long solved our problems.

1 Reply
Picture?type=square
Elizabeth Lassiter April 30, 2012, 10:36 PM

Are you implying that black culture is equated with an "anti-intellectual culture"? What we must realize is that this country has institutionalized stratification in the education system. Yes, there have been strides. However, the "playing field" that we all love to talk about, regardless of how cliche' it is, is not equal. Whether it ever will become equal is, at this time, an unanswerable question. How about the environment in which many of our black sons are being taught it? The environment that continuously tells them that they will fail academically. That they can only succeed as an athlete or musician or drug dealer? Or that they won't ever amount to anything at all? Would you feel very motivated? These are not excuses, this is reality. The reality that we as AMERICANS live in.

What solutions do you propose?

Sincerely,
A Black, self-loving, Junior Sociology Student concerned for the welfare of her future sons of this country

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Dan Drmacich April 18, 2012, 10:19 PM

Actually, in the few school districts that voluntarily desegregate on a 60/40 ratio of middle class and low-income students, the results have been very good for both kids of color & caucasian students. (Read Gerald Grant's book, "Hope and dispair in the American City," that details the critical differences between Syracuse, NY, and Wake County, N. Carolina. Research is very conclusive that as long as students are struggling in a concentration of poverty, they will generally fail. The Supreme Court was on target over 50 years ago when they stated in the Brown Case, that racially segregated schools are inherently unequal. The only answer to this issue is a combination of a "war on poverty," (which worked well under LBJ), massive funding increases for cities and the creation of metropolitan school districts.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Gail Kuhl April 18, 2012, 10:42 PM

This is Wayne writing... not Gail... the article states: "The study did not include charter schools. Most of the charters are in low-income and minority communities, and some of them have impressive test scores." When you click on the link to the so-called "impressive test scores" you discover that 62% of the charters got overall grades of A or B on the city's rating system and 60% of NON-charters got As or Bs. I don't know about you, but I don't find that to be a significant difference. If anything, it underscores the disparity "uncovered" by the Shott foundation

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Vicki Zunitch April 18, 2012, 11:24 PM

Step 1: they need to stop the practice of testing only 8-and-under-year-olds for G&T programs. The G&T tests are not accurate before age 7.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Rebecca Stanton April 19, 2012, 2:43 AM

I take great offense to Robert's comment about low motivation and anti-intellectual culture. His comments are not backed up by research. This culture of poverty theory was dispelled by academic researchers in the sociology of education many years ago. It is racist, simplistic, and uninformed. Dan is correct in stating. "Research is very conclusive that as long as students are struggling in a concentration of poverty, they will generally fail." We need to offer kids from poor backgrounds the same opportunities that more affluent kids get.

Add Reply
Add a Response
SchoolBook Bulletin Board
Welcome to SchoolBook

Schoolbook is a site dedicated to news, data and conversation about schools in New York City.

Have a News Tip?

Tell us what’s going on in your school. You can e-mail us with your tips or documents, or call 646-801-9698 and leave a voice message.

Contribute to Current & Future News Coverage

Join the Public Insight Network and help our journalists cover education in the city. Your stories and insights can help us create relevant and distinctive reporting. Join more than 100,000 people and become a trusted source.