News, data and conversation
about schools in New York City.
WNYC’s participation is supported by

Teaching Colleges Remain Wary of Survey

2 Comments
Respond

Aug. 22, 2012, 5:37 p.m.

A national survey of the nation’s teaching colleges has run into trouble getting private colleges to participate, many of which are located in New York City.

The review is being conducted by the non-profit National Council on Teacher Quality in Washington, D.C., which will publish a report grading the schools in March in conjunction with U.S. News & World Report. It says it’s responding to long-standing concerns about the low standards and quality of the nation’s 1400 teaching colleges, which have come under scrutiny by the Obama Administration. But the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this year on how private teaching colleges around the country have declined to participate in the review.

The council is planning to finish its review this fall but its president, Kate Walsh, said only three private institutions of higher education in New York state have participated in the survey: Syracuse, Concordia College in Bronxville and Five Towns College on Long Island.

Nationally, she said, just about 5 percent of private colleges have participated. But she said New York is critical because it’s a feeder state.

“New York has more schools of education than any other state in the country,” she explained, adding that its graduates work all over the country.

The council has obtained materials from public colleges, including SUNY, through state open records laws. It is examining syllabi, course descriptions, textbooks, student teaching manuals and graduate surveys.

The presidents of New York University, Fordham, Pace and several other private teaching colleges in New York state signed a letter last year explaining their opposition to the national review. They expressed concerns that the council is putting too much emphasis on course syllabi, calling it an “overly narrow, simplistic approach” that is also based on an invalid premise “that inputs are actually predictors of programmatic outcomes.”

Mary Brabeck, dean of the NYU Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, said her school has not changed its mind since then.

“Everyone wants our children to have the best teachers and we welcome efforts to improve teacher education,” she said, in an email. “We are happy to participate in evaluations to achieve that. However, the evaluation must be guided by a lot more rigor than NCTQ has demonstrated. Currently, the survey relies on standards that appear arbitrary and unsupported by research, and it uses them to draw incorrect conclusions. It’s a poor methodology.”

Ms. Walsh said her reviewers are looking at 18 different standards, including teacher preparation.

“We want to see if they’re teaching elementary teachers how to teach reading using good strong methods,” she said. “We want to know if the elementary teachers are learning sufficient math to confidently go into a classroom and be able to teach math.”

The council is also looking to see how selective the institutions are in their admissions. She said schools of education have such low admissions standards in some cases that it’s easier to become a teacher than to become a football player. The review will also look at outcomes, and whether the institutions track their graduates’ progress.

If the private schools don’t voluntarily turn over their materials, Ms. Walsh said her council will continue to gather the materials from professors and students. But she says she is running up against a March deadline, when the A-F reviews of all 1,400 teaching colleges are scheduled to be published.

“We continue to reach out to these programs to remind them that they are publicly approved to prepare public school teachers,” she said, “and with that comes some obligation to be publicly transparent in their methods and in their programs.”

Beth Fertig is a senior reporter at WNYC. Follow her on Twitter @bethfertig

2 Comments

Respond
Picture?type=square
Vicki Zunitch August 23, 2012, 3:09 AM

Elementary Journalism 101: Follow the money. The survey is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, along with some other tiny players. Of course it is biased. Of course it has poor methodology. Of course it makes certain assumptions. It probably asks if teachers-in-training are evaluated on a real-time basis and graded according to their ability to answer questions correctly 1 minute after they are discussed by the professor.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is behind everything happening to public education these days and the Times and WNYC do their readers a disservice by not mentioning who the financial backers are every time they do a story on such a nonprofit group. Nonprofit doesn't mean unbiased nor does it mean un-influenced by money.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Ellen Phillips August 23, 2012, 3:04 PM

Good point made: "The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is behind everything happening to public education these days and the Times and WNYC do their readers a disservice by not mentioning who the financial backers are every time they do a story on such a nonprofit group. Nonprofit doesn't mean unbiased nor does it mean un-influenced by money."

The reporting should be more transparent.

Add Reply
Add a Response
SchoolBook Bulletin Board
Welcome to SchoolBook

Schoolbook is a site dedicated to news, data and conversation about schools in New York City.

Have a News Tip?

Tell us what’s going on in your school. You can e-mail us with your tips or documents, or call 646-801-9698 and leave a voice message.

Contribute to Current & Future News Coverage

Join the Public Insight Network and help our journalists cover education in the city. Your stories and insights can help us create relevant and distinctive reporting. Join more than 100,000 people and become a trusted source.