News, data and conversation
about schools in New York City.
WNYC’s participation is supported by

Large Rises and Falls in Several Schools' Grades

5 Comments
Respond

Oct. 1, 2012, 5:34 p.m.

In the five years since the city first started handing out A-F letter grades to its schools, principals have gotten used to the extra scrutiny. They know a school can be closed if their students don’t show sufficient progress on their state exams.

City officials highlighted the stability of this year’s reports, noting that 86 percent of schools did not change more than one grade since last year. But there were dramatic changes at several schools.

Last year, P.S. 299 in Buswick, Brooklyn got a D on its progress report. Fewer than a third of its students passed their state English exams and about 40 percent were proficient in math. But this year, English proficiency went up by 10 percentage points and the school earned an A.

“We feel great about it,” said Principal Wilma Kanova Kirk. She added that her teachers looked closely at data and worked with students in small groups, and after school.

At P.S. 256 in Brooklyn, this year’s B was especially sweet because the school earned an F last year. The city briefly considered closing the school, but decided to give it a second chance.

Principal Sharyn Hemphill said the school proved it was up to the challenge. “We changed the way we taught,” she said, describing how teachers repeatedly assessed their pupils to figure out what they needed. In 2011, just about a third of the students were proficient in math and reading. This year, the percentage of students proficient in math went up 8 percentage points.

Hemphill said she never thought last year’s poor grade was accurate. “The math was not right,” she said, noting the school previously earned good marks.

But some schools that got low marks last year did not improve. General D. Chappie James Middle School
of Science
in Brooklyn earned its second D in a row, with fewer than 20 percent of its students proficient in math and English. The city is phasing out the Chappie elementary school but it kept the middle school open.

The Choir Academy of Harlem fell from a B to an F this year. So did P.S. 190 in East New York, Brooklyn and P.S. 368, which is a District 75 school for special education students in grades K-12. Calls to the schools were not returned.

At schools that saw big gains, principals weren’t the only ones celebrating. The Lexington Academy in East Harlem raised its grade from a D to an A. Speaking outside the school at dismissal, several parents said they noticed increased attention from teachers in the past year. Kimberly Scott said she was pleased with her daughter’s education at Lexington.

“She’s pretty good here. And she’s engaged,” Scott said. “She has a learning disability and they help that a lot. I see progress now.”

The city grades schools on a curve, awarding A’s and B’s to the top 25 and 35 percent. Schools in the bottom 10 percent are given D’s and F’s.

Schools that get three C’s in a row, an F or a D are considered at risk for closure. The city takes other criteria into consideration, such as quality reviews by outside educators. Presumably, those reviews will get extra attention. This year 217 schools received a C grade or lower compared to 116 last year.

Of those schools, 114 received three C’s in a row, compared to just five in 2011.

This leap is explained by the shift that occurred in 2010, when the state made its exams harder to pass. Many more students failed and, to compensate, the city put a low limit on how many schools could earn D and F grades, thereby increasing the number of schools receiving a grade of C.

Beth Fertig is a senior reporter at WNYC. Follow her on Twitter @bethfertig

5 Comments

Respond
Picture?type=square
Leonie Haimson October 1, 2012, 11:23 PM

I have to disagree with your headline in accepting the DOE spin of "overall stability." According to InsideSchools, fully one fourth of failing schools this year got top grades last year; how is that stable? The system is inherently unreliable, as the grades primarily depend on one year's worth of change in test scores, which experts say are 40-80% random. As you know, Beth, since you wrote about this in your book, James Liebman promised to try to minimize this volatility by eventually basing school grades on three years' worth of test scores, but the DOE has utterly failed to follow through on this promise. As another commenter has pointed out, PS 234, a top school, would have fallen from an A to a D in one year, if not for the braking mechanism in the formula that prevents more a fall of more than two grades. How anyone could believe that the same school with the same principal and staff could vary that much in quality in one year is beyond me. Indeed, making any sort of judgement of quality, no less high stakes decisions about which schools to close (!!) based upon such unstable and unreliable grades is absurd, and I think the media has responsibility to report this issue in a more objective fashion.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Leonie Haimson October 2, 2012, 1:05 PM

Thanks for changing the headline, but 24 schools had failing grades of D or F this year, falling from top grades of A or B last year. 24 is more than "several". For those who would like to see the section in Beth's book in which Liebman promised to change the system to be based on 3 years worth of test scores rather than one, which would ensure a modicum of stability, and a bit more reliability, see http://tinyurl.com/93qy43n p. 121. Of course, it would be harder to close schools or harangue them if the natural volatility of test scores were allowed to average out in this way.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Lisa Donlan October 2, 2012, 6:05 PM

You map shows ROSS GLOBAL ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
420 EAST 12 STREET (MANHATTAN)
2010-11 Grade: .
2011-12 Grade: .

This year's grade is not available.
RGA was closed down several years back and GPCS MS grades moved into that building.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Beth Fertig October 2, 2012, 10:23 PM

Thanks, Lisa. We've corrected the error. Sometimes even our heroic data team gets overwhelmed in a system with 1700 schools. And Leonie, we are looking into the design of the progress reports. We'll have a story up soon.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Dominick Speziale October 2, 2012, 11:42 PM

So P.S.99 got an "A" thats great--but the article says last year FEWER than 1/3 passed the ELA---but it doesn't say how much fewer--was the number 30%--20%--10%? If 10% passed last year and it went up 10% this year --does that mean this year a total of 11% passed the ELA-and now the school is rated "A"-the BEST in the City?--I think more details would help, but let's take the most optimistic assumption--last year 30% passed-increased by 10%--so now 33% passed-Yay!--but rated an "A"----By the way it is just as ridiculous when looking at schools that dropped fro"A" to "F"--ex:99%pas ELA drops to 90% and now school gets an "F" and is rated the WORST in the city with90% passing---kind of makes you think-doesn't it?

Add Reply
Add a Response
SchoolBook Bulletin Board
Welcome to SchoolBook

Schoolbook is a site dedicated to news, data and conversation about schools in New York City.

Have a News Tip?

Tell us what’s going on in your school. You can e-mail us with your tips or documents, or call 646-801-9698 and leave a voice message.

Contribute to Current & Future News Coverage

Join the Public Insight Network and help our journalists cover education in the city. Your stories and insights can help us create relevant and distinctive reporting. Join more than 100,000 people and become a trusted source.