News, data and conversation
about schools in New York City.
WNYC’s participation is supported by

School Support Networks More Responsive Than Ever

5 Comments
Respond

Oct. 22, 2012, 11:52 a.m.

On a recent Thursday afternoon, Eugenia Montalvo, principal of P.S. 106 Parkchester in the Bronx, popped into more than a half-dozen classrooms. She leaned down to ask students what they were learning, and she listened to teachers to get a sense of how they were progressing with one of the school’s instructional priorities, engaging students with challenging questions and discussion.

Montalvo is responsible for the learning and professional growth of dozens of educators and hundreds of students. In order to effectively do her job and meet increasingly high standards, she readily admits that she has to keep learning, too.

That’s why Montalvo was joined that afternoon by Petrina Palazzo and Dena Carroccetto, two members of the school support network that provides instructional and operational help to P.S. 106. Palazzo, a former principal and district administrator, and Carroccetto, an achievement coach, were helping Montalvo give teachers feedback on the rigor of their questioning.

After the classroom visits, Palazzo, Carrocceto and Montalvo compared their observations with results on the school’s recent progress report and began making an action plan. “Who are these students?” Palazzo asked, referring to a group of struggling second-graders. “And what are we doing or not doing with these students to get these results?”

Palazzo and her 15-member team are there for Montalvo and 24 other principals — in person, by email or by phone — when they need help with a myriad of issues such as interpreting state regulations, tackling a budgeting challenge or assisting a family that recently arrived from another country.

Each of the 1,500 district schools is supported by a network, comprised largely of former principals and teachers who specialize in areas like instruction, special education and human resources. The city’s Department of Education has always had field offices to support schools but over the last few years, as part of broader efforts to empower principals, the structure has evolved into one that is more dynamic and responsive to individual school and community needs.

Instead of having to contact a different office for each issue, principals like Montalvo receive support from a team that knows their schools well, allowing them to spend more time supporting staff with its most critical work.

Some networks are managed in collaboration with universities or community-based organizations. Some are organized around an area of expertise, such as data analysis, or philosophy, such as distributive leadership.

Some networks serve mostly elementary schools or schools in particular geographic areas, and some networks have instructional models to support particular groups of students such as English language learners or over-aged high school students. The idea is to offer principals an array of high-quality, integrated school support options and let them determine which will best serve their school.

Just like schools, networks are held accountable for their performance. We support struggling networks and, when feedback from principals and student results dictates, will make changes to ensure schools are receiving the supports they need.

The approach is working. Principals are able to review a menu of networks each year in an open enrollment period, but 92 percent choose to stay with their existing networks. On the 2012 Principal Satisfaction Survey, 86 percent of the more than 1,100 principals who participated said their network helps improve student achievement and 90 percent said they were satisfied with the overall quality of support provided.

This setup is also cost effective: the city spent 32 percent less on school support in 2011 than in 2006, which allowed more money to go directly to schools.

The networks also provide opportunities for teachers, students and parents. For example, Sandra Litrico’s network brings together a representative from each school once a month to discuss how to strengthen their teacher teams. Julia Bove’s network organizes parent coordinators to share best practices on increasing parent engagement, and Kathy Pelles’ network holds an annual student poetry jam. The camaraderie created by these types of gatherings and the networking that takes place benefit the schools.

Just ask Ramón González. As principal of M.S. 223 The Laboratory School for Finance and Technology in the Bronx, González could have elected to join a network of middle schools or Bronx schools. Instead, he chose a network that primarily includes principals with a similarly progressive bent who place an emphasis social justice issues. That most of these schools happen to be in Manhattan did not deter him.

González said his decision was based partly on the network leader, Marina Cofield, whom he called a “real thought partner,” and partly on the caliber of other principals in the network.

“If anything, I wanted to be challenged by schools that were stronger than we were at the time,” he said.

González credits the opportunity to engage with this self-selected group as instrumental in improving his school.

“I’m surrounded by peers that have similar belief systems that are also trying to cut down the achievement gap,” he said. “I feel blessed by the quality of the schools that I’m around.”

5 Comments

Respond
Picture?type=square
Leonie Haimson October 23, 2012, 1:25 AM

"Instead of having to contact a different office for each issue, principals like Montalvo receive support from a team that knows their schools well, allowing them to spend more time supporting staff with its most critical work." Wasn't this true about the districts, which DOE dissolved? Now network people spend half their time on the road, which is NOT efficient or cost-effective, and parents are left stranded, with no one to appeal bad decisions or abuses of principals, except to go to Tweed, which gives them a deaf ear.

1 Reply
Picture?type=square
Lisa Donlan October 23, 2012, 12:55 PM

Can we get some fact checking up in here?
This is sounding like a one-way unmonitored debate.

Show us your source data and justify your claims- otherwise it is just overblown rhetoric!

"The approach is working. Principals are able to review a menu of networks each year in an open enrollment period, but 92 percent choose to stay with their existing networks. On the 2012 Principal Satisfaction Survey, 86 percent of the more than 1,100 principals who participated said their network helps improve student achievement and 90 percent said they were satisfied with the overall quality of support provided.

This setup is also cost effective: the city spent 32 percent less on school support in 2011 than in 2006, which allowed more money to go directly to schools."

What I hear folks on the ground say, as opposed the those at 10,000 feet, is that the networks are terribly uneven, largely unhelpful and unavailable; that there is no clear or easy way to make a new selection year to year; that there is no theme or logic to their school groupings and that their school budgets are greatly reduced each year(so where are these supposed savings going?).

I have NEVER met a teacher or administrator, never mind students or parent that has anything positive to say about their network.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Lisa Donlan October 23, 2012, 12:56 PM

Can we get some fact checking up in here?
This is sounding like a one-way unmonitored debate.

Show us your source data and justify your claims- otherwise it is just overblown rhetoric!

"The approach is working. Principals are able to review a menu of networks each year in an open enrollment period, but 92 percent choose to stay with their existing networks. On the 2012 Principal Satisfaction Survey, 86 percent of the more than 1,100 principals who participated said their network helps improve student achievement and 90 percent said they were satisfied with the overall quality of support provided.

This setup is also cost effective: the city spent 32 percent less on school support in 2011 than in 2006, which allowed more money to go directly to schools."

What I hear folks on the ground say, as opposed the those at 10,000 feet, is that the networks are terribly uneven, largely unhelpful and unavailable; that there is no clear or easy way to make a new selection year to year; that there is no theme or logic to their school groupings and that their school budgets are greatly reduced each year(so where are these supposed savings going?).

I have NEVER met a teacher or administrator, never mind students or parent that has anything positive to say about their network.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Peter Goodman October 23, 2012, 4:13 PM

Do classroom teachers interact with network staff? Do the network staffers offer mini courses or professional development activities and if so what is the participation? Are the network staff attending common planning time sessions? Does the network facilitate "dropboxes" so that teachers can share lesson plans and curriculum maps? Do the networks sponsor parent forums to explain as well as listen to questions?

Principals, who are rated by superintendents and network leaders are reticent about expressing their "true" feelings? I hear principals complaining that networks are topdown "compliance machines" driving driving a "one size fits all" philosophy. One principal, "I suggested the network facilitate a at which we could share concerns ...," It not only was refused I received a hostile call from my cluster leader.

How many teachers can tell you what network they're part of? Very few. How many networks have "network leaderhip teams," principals, parents and teachers who meet regularly and work to gether to set network goals? None.

The theory of networks is not the reality.

Research tells us that collaboration, within grades, across grades, among schools, is a key to creating effective learning communities. Unfortunately we are not moving in that direction.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Lindy Uehling October 25, 2012, 6:26 PM

It is likely that no two Networks are the same. My experience of the support from my Network's cohesive team is 98% positive. (The 2% is when they've had to be away from the offices and not immediately available to my need of the moment.) Even then, I've received emails offering help from the Network person who is in the field (and they're not stuck on the subway). The majority of the schools in our Network are progressive schools--it's not easy holding to the mission and focusing on the children these days. There are so many offices and departments in this huge school system that pull our time and attention away. Every minute saved by a quick phone call to the Network is a lifesaver. The shared questioning and enriching discussions of instruction with the colleagues in the Network and specialists from the Network are important in maintaining our focus on the children and our commitment to the mission. The school Deborah Meier founded in 1974 is vibrant and still holding to the model, thanks to her clarity, specificity and direction. After reading the opinions of the impact of the Networks, I sense that the reality lies in how well each school and its Network fit together and that some Networks may be DOE-centered rather than school-centered. I can't imagine a better fit with a Network and the member schools than the one Central Park East 1 enjoys.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Yuet Chu November 8, 2012, 11:21 PM

@lisa - i was saddened by your post. as the network leader for CFN103, i have proudly served UNMS and CASTLE for the past six years. you and i have crossed paths many times - either at CEC meetings or at the Corlears campus. i am certain that if you asked Laura and Judi about network support, they would provide you with a plethora of evidence of our collaboration. i am confident that you would hear the same from any of the district 1 schools served by cluster one networks - Global Leaders, Tompkin Square, TASS, Henry Street, Earth School, Neighborhood School ... etc.

Add Reply
Add a Response
SchoolBook Bulletin Board
Welcome to SchoolBook

Schoolbook is a site dedicated to news, data and conversation about schools in New York City.

Have a News Tip?

Tell us what’s going on in your school. You can e-mail us with your tips or documents, or call 646-801-9698 and leave a voice message.

Contribute to Current & Future News Coverage

Join the Public Insight Network and help our journalists cover education in the city. Your stories and insights can help us create relevant and distinctive reporting. Join more than 100,000 people and become a trusted source.