News, data and conversation
about schools in New York City.
WNYC’s participation is supported by
Explore the News

A Charter Booster Says He's Helping Parents Find New Choices

9 Comments
Respond

Dec. 20, 2012, 4:00 a.m.

Most New Yorkers have never heard of Eric Grannis. But they might have heard of his wife, former City Councilwoman Eva Moskowitz – who founded the Success Academies charter network.

Like his wife, Grannis has now become a lightning rod in the debate over charter schools. The Manhattan attorney runs the Tapesty Project, which looks to build community support for new charter schools. It was through this project that Grannis set up meetings with parents in Williamsburg in 2011 that led to the proposal to bring in the new charter school Citizens of the World.

I met with Grannis at a cafe in downtown Brooklyn to talk about his role in the controversy. Grannis is a New York native who attended both private and public schools growing up in Manhattan. He met his future wife at Stuyvesant High School. He said his work with the Tapestry Project is completely separate from his wife’s charter network. And he adamantly denied accusations by critics that he was looking to start a charter school marketed to upper middle class parents. He said the new school aims to be ethnically and socio-economically diverse. And even though Northern Brooklyn has several good public schools, he said there is still a need for more choices.

Q.

Are the schools in that neighborhood really so unappealing that there’s a need for another charter? I looked at the latest progress reports, nine got A’s, nine got B’s, eight got C’s. I didn’t see a lot of failing schools.

A.

I think that it’s really for parents in the community, not me, to decide whether there needs to be another option in Willliamsburg and Greenpoint and there are obviously parents who want that option.

Q.

But you planted the seed?

A.

My organizaion’s job is to help parents learn about the charter school option if they want to pursue that. I enable them to make choices. I don’t make the choices.

Q.

Why Northern Brooklyn?

I’m very interested in starting schools that are socioeconomically diverse, that include poor and rich and white and black, and I believe profoundly in that. Northern Brooklyn is a neighborhood that is unusually diverse.

Q.

You don’t think the schools in that neighborhood are already diverse?

I think some of the schools are diverse, not all of the schools are diverse. In any neighborhood in New York City, many people have said – including “The Times” – that there’s a lack of diversity. So I think any neighborhood could use more diverse schools.

Q.

Did you look at data to see if they’re mixed enough, high performing enough?

Yes, I looked into the data and I think, like any neighborhood in New York City, you see students who are of color are tending to do less well than white students. And I think you’d be hard pressed to find any part of New York City where a socioeconomically good school… wouldn’t be helpful.

Q.

Are you hurting good community schools that are already diverse if you’re opening something marketed to appeal to middle class familes?

A.

It’s not marketed to appeal to upper middle class families. It’s marketed to appeal to all families.

Q.

How?

I went to parents and I asked them what type of education they wanted. And found a school (Citizens of the World) that we thought would be of interest to parents because it had been successful in satisfying needs of families in California across the socioeconomic spectrum…. There aren’t many socio-economically diverse charter schools.

Q.

What were you hearing from Brooklyn parents?

A.

They were very interested in project-based learning, in relatively small class sizes and most importantly they wanted a school that thought that diversity was a plus. And Citizens is one of the few schools in the charter school sector which made a real point of regarding diversity as a valuable goal.

Q.

It’s also different than charters called “no excuses,” because they’re very strict?

A.

That’s correct, they seem to have a more progressive approach to education and that seemed to me something a lot of parents wanted.

Q.

Does that mean that the middle class and upper middle class families don’t like the typical charters in New York City?

A.

I think many middle class parents don’t like the no excuses schools that have particularly rigid discipline, that is true.

Q.

So opponents might ask, why is a progressive charter that has a different educational philosophy good for the upper middle class families but not good for the lower middle class families of Harlem and Bedford-Stuyvesant? Do you see a need to change the charter culture in neighborhoods where poor families have these very strict schools? Why don’t they get the type of schools middle class families want?

A.

I think that some – more parents from poor communities — like a strict charter school, in my opinion, than do middle class families. But many of them don’t. And they, too, should have more progressive education options, that’s absolutely correct.

Q.

What about all the people who have said we don’t need this school?

There are hundreds and hundreds of parents who signed petitions and want this as an option. I think those parents who don’t want this as an option don’t have to send their kids there. But I don’t think they ought to be in the position of saying that those parents who do want this as an option should be prevented from having it.

It was the parents themselves who collected the petitions, I believe there were hundreds and hundreds. And by the way, I’ve never seen a charter school before, having done this many times, where the petition gathering effort was almost entirely run by parents themselves with very little involvement by Citizens [of the World].

Q.

Are you surprised at all by the negative reaction this proposal has generated? It’s similar to what’s happened in places where your wife’s network has tried to open, in neighborhoods that are gentrifying. People are very wary and suspicious of the charter movement.

A.

It saddens me. It doesn’t surprise me. We’ve seen over time people are often frightened by new types of things. When you had the Civil Rights movement in the ’50s not everyone welcomed that concept with open arms. The fact that people are upset about things does not necessarily mean they are bad things.

Q.

Do you think you did as good a job as you could reaching out to low income families?

A.

We certainly made efforts and hired someone specifically, a woman of color with a community organizing background. I think we’d like to start earlier and do better next time.

Beth Fertig is a senior reporter at WNYC. Follow her on Twitter @bethfertig

9 Comments

Respond
Picture?type=square
Diana Zelvin December 21, 2012, 12:42 AM

People need to question Eric Grannis' motivation for bringing a charter school to one of the most rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods in the city. He lives on the Upper West side. He is an attorney. What is his personal interest here all about? He is already shown this community that he is dishonest. He pretended to be a parent here last year on our local parent yahoo group, until he was outed. That website is strictly for parents in the community. He used it to openly solicit people from our neighborhood, to get them interested in Citizens.

A friend of mine with no children bought a house in Williamsburg was asked by her attorney at her closing to sign a petition to bring Citizens of the World here. Is this the "hundreds" of people Eric is talking about? At all the hearings for Citizens, there are never more then the same 3 people in the community who show up in their support. Where are all those hundreds of people? Yet there are hundreds of parents in the community who have turned out in opposition. These are parents who love their public schools in district 14. These are the same parents that know we have amazing choices here, 20 elementary schools already.

Does Eric Grannis mean to tell us, that as someone who doesn't live here, that he knows what's better for us than the politicians who are all passionately against this charter and than the hundreds of parents in the community that love their schools.

Does Eric Grannis really believe his own rhetoric, that people are afraid of change? Really, in one of the most rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods in the city? Are the politicians afraid of change, or do have we elected them to help keep the stays quo? We are afraid of the destructive nature these charters have brought upon the schools and communities they have co-located. People have embraced change here including the HUGE improvements in the past few years in our public schools. Community members here are VERY
savvy and educated. We are armed with what the reality of what Success Academy and Citizens of the World are all about. Is he not aware of the 73 page document WAGPOPS compiled stating all the facts and issues that are deeply troubling about Citizens of the World and is being used as part of the lawsuit against them?

Success Academy is the charter school chain that Eric's wife, Eva Moscowitz, has been able to force upon communities because of her cozy relationship with the mayor (let's remember Bloomberg has mayoral control of our school system and is interested in closing as many public schools and replacing with charters as he can before his term ends). Let's remember Eva made a run for Manhattan Borough President, and when she failed she focused on expansion of her schools. She was considering a run for mayor. Do she and her husband care about
education, or is it the need for power? Their whole claim that we have a need here is disproven by her very own school here in Williamsburg. There were no people here banging down the doors to get in, the children enrolled there are mostly from outside this community. Just saying

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Kate Yourke December 20, 2012, 4:22 PM

"I think that it’s really for parents in the community, not me, to decide whether there needs to be another option in Willliamsburg and Greenpoint"

interesting comment from someone who knows very well that communities have no say in decisions regarding their schools.

Every elected official, the Community Board, the Community Education Council and myriad community-based organizations representing Williamsburg and Greenpoint have submitted written opposition to this school. Over 300 local parents are plaintiffs in a law suit against SUNY for authorizing this charter. Eric Grannis knows how meaningless opposition is in the era of irresponsible charter authorizers and Mayoral Control.

2 Replies
Picture?type=square
Eric Grannis December 22, 2012, 5:37 AM

Dear readers,
For a year, Ms. Yourke and a small but voluble group of charter school opponents have made allegations against me and against Citizens of the World Charter School that range from the outrageous (that we are racist) to the juvenile (that I “suck eggs”). They claimed my non-profit, the Tapestry Project, did no outreach to lower income parents (in fact, we reached out to more than 20 head starts); that Tapestry isn’t truly a non-profit (it is, check Guidestar); that local parents didn’t support Citizens or were just tricked into signing sign-in sheets that didn’t indicate real support (see here at pages 445 to 505 the hundreds of signatures on petitions clearly indicating support for Citizens: www.newyorkcharters.org/pdf/Jan2012ProposalSummaries/CitizensWorldCSNY1FULLAPPLICATION.Redacted.pdf ); and that Citizens only seeks to serve affluent white students (in fact, its schools in California are admirably diverse and the organization was founded by an African American woman who believes passionately in diversity, see www.citizensoftheworld.org).
Ms. Yourke and her friends attempted to peddle these lies to Beth Fertig. Perhaps they thought she’d be receptive because she’s written several articles critical of charter schools. True -- but she is also a diligent and well respected journalist. Every single allegation you are reading in these comments and many more were made to Ms. Fertig who then pressed me about them and independently investigated them. In every instance, she found the allegations to be demonstrably false, which is why they don’t appear in her story.
Fortunately, I’m thick skinned. (I confess that I even find it amusing that Ms. Yourke publicly called my work racist and rather than apologize, she just complains she was actually quoted!) Sadly, however, many parents have been intimidated into silence.
It’s wonderful that Ms. Yourke and her friends are happy with the schools their children attend and it’s truly admirable they are so devoted to them. However, many families in District 14 aren’t so lucky or satisfied. In fact, the head of El Puente, a leading District 14 community group, said he wouldn’t send his child to any of his four neighborhood schools with the sole exception of a special dual language program contained within one of these schools. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7G_uIRiGic&feature=youtu.be. As noted in Ms. Fertig’s article, many District 14 families, particularly lower income ones, welcome charter schools because they aren’t happy with their district school options. But sadly, some parents who are lucky to have children in good schools are fighting the creation of additional options for families who aren’t so lucky.
The many parents in District 14 who supported Citizens despite the bullying should feel proud. I would encourage other parents to stand up and not be intimidated into silence. There is nothing wrong with wanting more good educational options for your own and other children in the community. There are many others like you who have been quiet just because they didn’t want to be publicly vilified.

Picture?type=square
Kate Yourke December 27, 2012, 5:47 AM

Eric Grannis prefers to minimize opposition and reduce the scope of discussion so it appears to be just myself and "a small but voluble group" opposing this school.

The opposition to Citizens of the World is much wider than myself and a small group. Every local elected official, our Community Board, the CEC and all our major Community Based Organizations are opposed, and over 300 parents signed on to the lawsuit to stop the location of Citizens of the World Charter school in District 14. Even our affable Borough President opposes this school. Hm, why would all these people work so hard to restrict parents' choice?

Citizens of the World strategically navigated our community, avoiding any member or organization with leadership in education. By crafting their presentation to appeal first to isolated new white residents and (later in the process) isolated Head Start programs, they attempted to groom support while avoiding tipping off informed leadership as to their plans.

As a member of the District 14 Community Education Council, I witnessed the vulnerability and neglect of our local schools and the DOE's inability to address the changing demographic in North Brooklyn. As a member of WIGSIG and organizer of a forum on the effect of the changing demographic on our District public schools, I saw the Department of Education completely unprepared and unwilling to address the new diversity. As a driving member of the Task Force bringing together our local elected officials, community leaders, and the Department of Education to address the integration of new residents into our public schools, I witnessed the guarded, duplicitous manipulations of the DOE leadership with whom Mr. Grannis seems so cozy. Now, many years later, to see these sincere, locally led and diverse efforts used as justification for the forced co-location of a privately run charter elementary school from Los Angeles -claiming Diversity as its theme- is appalling.

This issue is absolutely not about parents being lucky or unlucky in their schools, or having a right to choice. This community has been prevented from exercising any input in the decision-making for our District public schools, and decisions made for our District have been clumsy - at best. But parents are doing it for themselves- building diverse school communities, forming coalitions with local leadership like the Southside Community Schools Coalition and WAGPOPS, and growing lines of communication which have led to the integration and revitalization of many of our public schools. Forcing charter school co-locations is a poor substitute for genuine leadership. And packaging it as somehow more noble than supporting truly public schools is absolutely nauseating. Yes, there are problems with the public school system, but it seems those with the power to support our schools are more interested in breaking down the system than following common sense - and doing their jobs- to protect and develop the public schools within their responsibility. There is a lot of misinformation driving the dismantling of our public education system, but those of us with skin in the game are willing and able to provide real leadership and support in our communities, and here in North Brooklyn, it is working.

I did not 'complain' that I was quoted as saying the proposal for Citizens of the World is racist, and I am certainly not going to apologize. I would have preferred if the depth of our discussion had been represented in my quote, as labeling something as racist tends to flatten meaning and inflame debate.

The aggressive expansion of charter schools will one day be recognized for its destructive impact on upward mobility in our society. To claim that we oppose this school because we are "frightened by new types of things" and then lay claim to some legacy of the Civil Rights movement is outrageous. There is inherent racism in how power plays out in our public education system, and it becomes clearer as each day passes.

If you desire true diversity in your experience of community, you will find it only if you are willing to step out of your comfort zone and adapt to an environment which you do not control. To use your privilege to claim resources currently utilized by a low income community of color is not a noble exercise, no matter what fantasy you might promote. But I suppose, Mr. Grannis, you are not satisfied with having the advantages of your status, of the rigged system of charter school authorization, and Mayoral Control on your side, you must also have your fantasy of nobility satisfied as well. I'm afraid the bounds of my generosity do not extend that far.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Williamsburg Greenpoint December 20, 2012, 3:12 PM

Eric Granis believes in a "free market" approach to education - where schools (with TAX dollars) open and close at the whim of a market. Given the outrage (and lawsuits) we've seen regarding school closings, we should REALLY rethink that policy.

Here's some very local background on how "Citizens of the World" handled their marketing.
http://thewgnews.com/2012/09/...

This issue of support for "Citizens of the World" is a LOT more problematic than Grannis lets on, including a real estate lawyer soliciting signatures for his petition at real estate closings, and parents who had no idea that attending a meeting about "Citizens of the World" out of curiosity would be interpreted as SUPPORT for the school opening.

The parents who support "Citizens" have no idea of the landscape of choices that are available to them. Our diverse neighborhood public schools offer MORE of what parents who support "Citizens" claim they want then "Citizens" offers. The opening of new schools in our district should be a matter of CITY PLANNING and not driven by our districts' least-informed "consumers" of education.

In fact, if Grannis REALLY believed in supporting the desires of parents, he would recognize that what this district has REPEATEDLY asked for are more quality middle school seats. Co-locating this school in JHS126, the ONLY middle school in Greenpoint within walking distance of FOUR excellent elementary schools (including 3 "A"s and two Blue Ribbon schools) is absurdly bad city planning. JHS1265 just got a new principal and we want JHS126 to grow.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Dirk Peters December 21, 2012, 6:36 AM

Eric Grannis, go home. You have already exposed yourself as a hypocrite at best or a rascist at worst, advocating "progressive" schools for middle-and upper-class families while selling "no excuses" charter schools to the lower class. Don't all students deserve equal opportunities?
Furthermore, it is highly offensive to compare the charter school movement to the civil rights movement. The fact that there was a "negative reaction" to your program does not equate charter schools with the march to Selma. The negative reaction is due to your heavy-handed, top-down approach, one that could be likened more to a corporate takeover than a grassroots movement.
In your final response, you mentioned hiring a "woman of color". A single minority employee does not mean that your organization represents minorities in the community as a whole. While your intentions are surely noble, your plan is flawed, your interview is confused, and the community has soundly rejected your proposal. In the pursuit of "options," or perhaps market share, your so-called "Tapestry Project" is ripping apart the fabric a vibrant, already-diverse community.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Williamsburg Greenpoint December 27, 2012, 5:01 PM

Responding to Eric Grannis:
It is not surprising that you are unable to gauge the response to "Citizens of the World Charter Schools" when you don't live in the district, have never visited any of our neighborhood public schools, and don't know our parents except the select few who also have very limited knowledge of the educational landscape of D14.
Over 300 parents signed on to a lawsuit against the SUNY Charter School Institute to STOP "Citizens of the World" from being housed in our district and that is in addition to the well over 500 letters sent to SUNY at the very beginning of this process. At the two public Hearings, the opposition to "Citizens of the World" was overwhelming. The last Hearing 250 people (mostly parents) showed up opposed and there were only 7 people in favor, 4 of whom work for "Citizens of the World."
It is true that people in our district have latched on to a variety of arguments against "Citizens of the World," Tapestry Project, and your insistence that we accept the options you've used your considerable political and economic power to foist upon us.
Beth Fertig is a reporter with a limited amount of space to tell her story. That Fertig didn't include the variety of reasons parents are opposed to "Citizens of the World" has more to do with the amount of space she has than any arguments you presented.
It is not surprising that "Citizens of the World" would reach out to the lower income parents who, like their few affluent supporters, are not aware of the variety of school options already available to them. When Ms. Notari toured the daycare proselytizing for "Citizens of the World," did she mention that less than 10 blocks away, PS84 has a phenomenal principal, is building a Greenhouse classroom, is economically and racially diverse, has a dual language Spanish program, and abundant arts and sports enrichment? Did Ms. Notari mention PS414's diverse dual language Spanish school? Or PS110's with a dual language French program? Did Ms. Notari discuss PS132's fantastic band? Or the abundance of chess in our neighborhood schools? Ballroom dancing? The eight "A" rated schools? Our Blue Ribbon schools? Did Ms. Notari tell these parents that there is NO waiting list or lottery for any of these excellent schools?
No. Ms. Notari, like "Citizens of the World" and yourself, is exploiting the limited information parents have about our D14 neighborhood schools. Our NYC DOE schools don't have a marketing budget or paid employees like Tara Phillips.
The very simple and incontrovertible argument that continues to hold water has to do with city planning. This is TAX PAYER funds we're using and it is wasteful to increase the number of elementary schools in our district when our excellent elementary schools (superior to "Citizens of the World') have plenty of room for children. Finally, any one with even the most basic knowledge of good city planning would recognize that JHS126 is the only middle school in Greenpoint and parents want that school to have room to grow.
Finally, Mr. Grannis, we refute your "evidence" of outreach just as we did to the SUNY Charter School Institute. Please see pp: 36-42. Also, you can read how support for charter schools generally has been inflated citywide on pp: 4-5.

To read the REAL story of how "Citizens of the World" came into D14, you can read the local story by a local parent: http://thewgnews.com/2012/09/...

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Williamsburg Greenpoint December 27, 2012, 5:03 PM

Finally, Mr. Grannis, we refute your "evidence" of outreach just as we did to the SUNY Charter School Institute. Please see pp: 36-42. Also, you can read how support for charter schools generally has been inflated citywide on pp: 4-5.


Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Diana Zelvin January 3, 2013, 3:12 AM

Mr Grannis, I am glad you are such an admirer of Luis Garden Acosta of El Puente, so are we! He is a prominent leader of the community here and hundreds of people listen to what he has to say. He is strongly behind the public schools of district 14!!!

In fact, regardless of how you want to spin a comment made by Luis out of context a while ago, you need to check your facts. You clearly don't know that not only is Luis the leader of El Puente, he is also the leader of Southside Community Schools Coalition. "The Southside Community Schools Coalition (SCSC) is a coalition of community-based organizations, churches, elected officials, education activists, school administrators, teachers, and parents who are committed to fighting for a community voice in school decision-making, and who are committed to supporting all Williamsburg schools in becoming excellent learning and development centers worthy of the needs and potential of our children"

SCSC happens to be fighting AGAINST Success and Citizens. Luis helped lead the charge at our march and protest at the Success Academy hearing last year at MS50. Rmember that one? Where our community had over 500 people protesting SA, and your wife bused in FOUR busloads of Harlem parents masquerading as community support. Her people pushing their way in through a back door to fill up the seats so we couldn't get all of our people in the room. When one of our parents asked during the hearing who in the audience was in favor of having Success Academy in our community, only ONE person raised their hand. Luis spoke out passionately against your wife's school, who is pushing out El Peunte's Beacon Afterschool program at MS50.

Luis and El Puente are very excited about their partnership with PS 84 on STEM curriculum and other education programs.

El Puente had their students spend all summer sweating outside PS 84 painting a spectacular mural. And Luis is an ardent supporter of the PS 84 Greenhouse Rooftop Classroom.

But you wouldn't know about any of that would you - being that you don't live here and all.

By the way, I have spoken at length to Citizen's Director Etoy Ridgnal, Citizen's lead applicant Jeremy Robbins and the only other 2 people in the community that want Citizens here. They all assured me, that they want nothing to do with you and have distanced themselves from you because even they find you and your wife's methods highly distasteful. Yet here you are speaking as their representative. So who are we to beleive? Are you all lying? Interestingly, Etoy and Jeremy were noticably absent from the last hearing. Hmmm, change of heart about Citizen's?

What parent would want their child to be part of such a disturbing "education" system?

Oh yeah, hardly anyone.

Just saying.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Cristina Dodd January 11, 2013, 2:44 AM

Dear Mr. Grannis,
Funny that you should use the term "peddling lies". I clearly remember stumbling across your Schoolfisher page that attempted to inform prospective homebuyers of the grades of the schools in their district. But you listed my child's school as an F, when in fact it was a B. Who knows how many other schools you mis-rated in the very district your wife was opening her schools in. You also assert on this public forum that anyone opposed to your mission is friends with one person who you apparently don't like to make it seem like you are being bullied (even throwing "sucking eggs" for effect). Lie and manipulation. And you also claim that Beth Fertig found allegations to be demonstratively false...I never heard that in the interview, sir. Lie, manipulation, and putting words into people's mouth. It's not unexpected at all to hear you and your 5 supporting compatriots to cry bully when someone calls you out on the lies and misinformation that you continue to disseminate. You obviously have no idea what bullying is, and for that alone you should not be allowed within walking distance of any child education facility. I'll tell you what real bullying is: BULLYING present participle of bul·ly
Verb
Use superior strength or influence to intimidate (someone), typically to force him or her to do what one wants.
Like when a person or group of people have political ties to a mayor who has turned the department of education into a dictatorship in order to allow them to shove substandard schools down a communities throat when they clearly do not want them.
Your opponents are not the bullies, Mr. Grannis. You are, your wife is, and Citizens of the World is.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Cristina Dodd January 11, 2013, 2:59 AM

One more thing Mr. Grannis...could you please state for the record whether or not your own children attend charter schools.
Thank you.

1 Reply
Picture?type=square
January 12, 2013, 7:56 PM

Yes, actually, they do. Eric Grannis

Add Reply
Add a Response
SchoolBook Bulletin Board
Welcome to SchoolBook

Schoolbook is a site dedicated to news, data and conversation about schools in New York City.

Have a News Tip?

Tell us what’s going on in your school. You can e-mail us with your tips or documents, or call 646-801-9698 and leave a voice message.

Contribute to Current & Future News Coverage

Join the Public Insight Network and help our journalists cover education in the city. Your stories and insights can help us create relevant and distinctive reporting. Join more than 100,000 people and become a trusted source.