News, data and conversation
about schools in New York City.
WNYC’s participation is supported by
Explore the News

UFT and City Fail to Reach Evaluation Deal

Kristen Artz courtesy of flickr.com/photos/nycmayorsoffice
4 Comments
Respond

Jan. 17, 2013, 3:36 p.m.

Yasmeen Khan explains the late-hour breakdown of teacher evaluation talks

|Updated: This story has been updated to include statements from the teachers’ and principals’ union leaders.

The public end came at 1:49 p.m. in the form of an email from the teachers’ union with the subject line “UFT President: Bloomberg torpedoes teacher evaluation deal.” What ensued was a flurry of recriminations as both sides blamed the other for the failure to agree on how to fairly evaluate a teacher’s performance.

Bloomberg said the actual end of talks came earlier, when union negotiators “unilaterally walked away from our negotiations” at around 3 a.m. Thursday. He complained that they kept adding demands to a deal that was essentially done. One sticking point, he said, was that the union wanted the proposed evaluation system to last only two years.

“The UFT wanted the entire agreement to sunset in June of 2015. That condition would essentially render the entire agreement meaningless,” the mayor said because the process of removing an ineffective teacher takes two years.

The president of the United Federation of Teachers, Michael Mulgrew, disputed the mayor’s version of events, going so far as to say the mayor was “lying.” He said negotiators had reached agreement but Bloomberg “blew it up.”

“The mayor’s constant need to always say I need more and it’s either my way or the highway is why today we do not have that agreement,” he told reporters. “I am sitting here trying not to be too angry.”

The president of the Council of School Supervisors and Administrators, Ernest Logan, also said it was the mayor who scuttled a deal with the principals too. He said all parties involved in talks understood there would be a sunset clause; for the CSA it was a one-year plan.

“The CSA and the DOE were closing in on a final agreement on January 16, just before midnight. However, moments later, the Mayor intervened, demanding an agreement for an indefinite period of time,” Logan said.

“It is important to know that the overwhelming majority of school systems throughout the state have reached a one-year agreement in order to evaluate and modify it later to better serve our children. The state law provides for a one-year evaluation plan and the mayor supported the enactment of this legislation,” he added in a statement.

Earlier, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said he would not budge from his expectation that school districts meet the Jan. 17 deadline in order to qualify for state aid.

“Today is the final deadline for the handful of school districts, including New York City, that have failed to get their teacher evaluation systems in place. Please hear me – there will be no extensions or exceptions. Since we established one of the strongest teacher evaluation models in the nation last year, 98% of school districts have successfully implemented them. The remaining districts and their unions have until midnight tonight to do the same or they will forfeit the increase in education aid they have been counting on and both parties will have failed the children they serve.”

As a result, city schools face losing up to $450 million in state aid and grant money. The mayor said it was too early to know where the cuts would occur but they would come from the education budget.

Mulgrew said his members should expect 11 more months of “darkness,” as they wait for Bloomberg’s tenure in City Hall to end.

4 Comments

Respond
Picture?type=square
Dan McConnell January 17, 2013, 11:35 PM

The mayor's position that a 2yr agreement would be meaningless is a dishonest whiner's stance. Like when you watch FOX and their argument against allowing tax cuts for the rich to expire: the money won't pay off the massive debt, so that approach doesn't make sense. Really? So if I want to climb a set of stairs, taking one step won't help get me there? Sounds as if Bloomberg is unwilling to be reasonable and prudent-waiting for a disingenuous faulted and incomplete set of attack-style reforms to settle into a more collaborative effort.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Leonie Haimson January 18, 2013, 4:17 AM

Mayor for life wannabe. Apparently 90% of NYS districts have a one year sunset; two years weren't good enough for this megalomaniac.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Elizabeth Ellis January 18, 2013, 3:36 PM

Grown men & women fail to come to an agreement and who takes the brunt of the $450 million shortfall? The children. Pathetic.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
James Boutin January 19, 2013, 2:28 AM

I used to teach in NYC. Now I'm in Seattle. What a difference the West Coast makes. So much less stressful to not be surrounded with these disgraceful stories anymore.

Add Reply
Add a Response
SchoolBook Bulletin Board
Welcome to SchoolBook

Schoolbook is a site dedicated to news, data and conversation about schools in New York City.

Have a News Tip?

Tell us what’s going on in your school. You can e-mail us with your tips or documents, or call 646-801-9698 and leave a voice message.

Contribute to Current & Future News Coverage

Join the Public Insight Network and help our journalists cover education in the city. Your stories and insights can help us create relevant and distinctive reporting. Join more than 100,000 people and become a trusted source.