News, data and conversation
about schools in New York City.
WNYC’s participation is supported by
Explore the News

Effective Teacher Training: Worth the Cost

Question What does your perfect teacher evaluation system look like?
Respond

Jan. 21, 2013, 6:00 a.m.

One of the recommendations put forth by Governor Andrew Cuomo’s education panel is to better train teachers and principals but exactly how that should happen is left undefined. Fortunately, there is a program already in use by the group New Visions for Public Schools that I believe should serve as a model for a statewide effort.

The Urban Teacher Residency Program, run in conjunction with Hunter College, engages prospective teachers in a year-long apprenticeship at a New Visions school while they earn their master’s degree at Hunter. The program graduates teachers who are well trained, teachers who begin their careers with their eyes wide open to the challenges of teaching, teachers who are relieved of the burden of attending school at night, and teachers who have committed to making education their vocation.

Based upon my experience hiring graduates of the program, I believe UTR-trained people are far better positioned to be successful teachers than any other group of new teachers with whom I have worked. They are ready for classroom teaching in their first year and that early success increases the chances they will stay in the profession long enough to become really good teachers. And since the UTR program requires its teachers to be consistently engaged in questioning themselves about the best way to help our young people learn, they add immeasurably to the professional conversation in our community.

Like a traditional student teaching program, UTR residents work and learn in the classrooms of veteran teachers. However, that work begins well before the opening day of school and continues until graduation, enabling the resident to fully comprehend the trajectory and rigor of a school year. By constantly looking at student work these apprentice teachers are trained to examine how our decisions, choices, and approaches to instruction affect the way students learn. The apprentice also works with a small group of students, tracking how various educational interventions affect students’ progress. Furthermore, the UTR residents regularly report on their successes and challenges to their colleagues, engaging in an ongoing discussion and examination of their practice. This commitment to working in public (as opposed to the tradition of teaching in isolation), is undoubtedly the most powerful tool we have to improve the quality of instruction in our schools.

The experienced colleagues who are gracious and generous enough to mentor UTR residents receive regular coaching and instruction focused on their own growth as well. This has the ancillary but no less important benefit of engaging veteran teachers in discussions about their own professional growth.

However, there are clearly obstacles to expanding the UTR program throughout the state. It is a very expensive program. Albany lawmakers would have to be willing to pay the real costs of teacher training. Also, the program is based on the idea that the profession is worthy of a long term commitment. A program like this requires a serious commitment from serious people. It is not for dabblers.

The demonstrated success of the UTR program requires us to recognize that alternative certification programs which do not train new teachers to teach before they enter our classrooms are not the best way to introduce people to teaching. Many fine people have begun their careers through such programs, and our school in particular has benefitted immensely from the New York City Teaching Fellows program. However, the teachers from many alternative certification programs enter our classrooms untrained and unequipped to do their jobs well from day one. Some do learn quickly on the job, but they do so at the expense of our young people. Others do not, and they are often replaced by other, temporary teachers. The high attrition rate of such new teachers is costly, and our students shoulder the largest portion of those costs.

We know how to train teachers well. It is a rigorous and costly process but one that offers rewards and savings on the other side, when we have dedicated professionals ready to stay and tackle the never-ending process of learning how to be a great teacher.

Philip Weinberg is the principal of the High School of Telecommunication Arts and Technology in Brooklyn.

Picture?type=square
Tom Griffith November 30, 2012, 10:58 PM

Teachers need to learn what their rights are under the contract they have with the city. I have to admit I don't fully understand or appreciate this issue myself. However, I feel if I knew better I would have more time to do the basic things I need to do for my students and myself to be a better teacher. I believe in unions, in the UFT, and in the idea that by fairly and reasonably considering our rights under the contract we can do a better job all around. I know this is not normal feedback, but it would help me. (And I am 12 years in - - imagine what the new teachers are going through...)

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Vicki Zunitch December 1, 2012, 2:00 PM

Parent feedback reviews of teachers. Make the feedback valuable by providing general topic areas and offering parents with open-ended questions and an "anything else?" section -- not just a multiple-choice questionnaire.
Hold parents accountable for staying productive by forbidding parent anonymity. Use the feedback questionnaires as 1/2 of the basis for parent-teacher conferences, which by law should be more than 5 minutes.

2 Replies
Picture?type=square
Sophia DeLustro January 18, 2013, 11:21 PM

1/2 yeah right! So that parents who hate their child's teacher can sabatoge them.. absolutely not! Teachers should be rated on their work and that alone!

Picture?type=square
Vicki Zunitch January 19, 2013, 12:53 AM

Forming positive partnerships with the ultimate authority over children -- their parents -- IS part of a teacher's work.
Parents who hate their kids' teacher are only 1/2 a nightmare. (The parents may have good reason.) The real nightmare scenario is teachrs who hate a child, or teeachers who retaliate against a child because the parent is vocal about school shortcomings (something my class parent warned me about).

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Vicki Zunitch December 3, 2012, 6:03 PM

Imagine if your peers and principal were to hear this from parents: "Although the teacher is a favorite of the administration, I spend 4 hours a night on homework with my child teaching reading and math that hasn't been effectively taught in class. I tried to help my child learn how to read initial consonant blends such as bl--, dr--, and so on. But my child told me the only thing the teacher taught about reading today was to read a script that went like this:'Class, what do readers do? Readers read. Readers look at the title of the book. Readers look at the first word in the title. Readers look at the first letter of the first word in the title.' But by that time, since I'm 4 years old and had already been sitting at a desk for 3 hours doing math worksheets and something called "consensus desk-based play time with learning toys for building," I couldn't really understand anything else the teacher said."

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Schoolbook Editors December 3, 2012, 6:34 PM

Here are some responses we received via Twitter:

Erin K. Quigley (@ekquigley) wrote, "Evals should involve ongoing conversations...not once-a-semester observations."

Jessica Saratovsky (@JSaratovsky) tweeted, "Evaluations need to be meaningful and tied to goals. They also need to be linked to providing relevant PD."

Swayne Harris (@swayneharris), gave advice to teachers, "If you teach in a poor area, try to understand those students and their needs with sensitivity." Harris added, "Make sure you are there for the love of teaching and not just for the vacation time."

Finally, David Hochheiser (@DavidHochheiser), answered, "Too much variety anywhere "Current evals" probably not all equal. Respected admin + viable feedback + implement time = validity."

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Maggie Thornton December 6, 2012, 9:18 PM

What about peer review? It's often very helpful to hear from other teachers working with the same (or similar students). We we see each other working with those students in different contexts, we can help each other become better at addressing those students' needs.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Cris Petersen January 18, 2013, 10:30 PM

A combination of scores, formal observation, and asking students about what goes on in class has been shown to be the most effective way of evaluating a teacher's effectiveness.

http://www.reuters.com/articl...

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Gary Malone January 20, 2013, 12:43 AM

In order to have an effective evaluation system, the evaluators must be experts on what they are evaluating. Being a "highly effective" teacher should be a prerequisite to obtaining a position as an administrator. If I were asked to evaluate and assign ratings to plumbers, I'd have a tough time doing it, and I'd probably do a lousy job since I have no experience in plumbing, so I don't really know what being a good plumber involves. The same holds true for teaching. Under our current "leadership" (pun intended), little or no experience in education is actually a preferred quality in prospective principals. Having master teachers as administrators would not only make evaluations better, but it would also put people who can actually help to develop their teachers into the right positions.
If you want to make test scores part of the equation, then tests that actually measure teacher quality need to be developed and implemented. There also needs to be a variety of evaluation measures; surely you can't rate a Pre-K teacher, a middle school special ed science teacher, and a high school gym teacher with the same system.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Annette Evans January 21, 2013, 5:57 AM

Many times teachers do not have a choice how to teach a subject, but instead are given a pre-scripted curriculum that is imposed upon them and their students.

Many (most) NYC classrooms are overcrowded, and some don't even have textbooks.

The standardized tests have proven to be poorly constructed and inaccurate.

There are children who attend school who have obstacles outside the school, like poverty, disabilities, ELL, that will affect how they perform in schools.

Not all people are good at everything, not all students are good at everything. We need to acknowledge there are difference in children and their abilities whether academic, artistic or athletic.

So how does one devise an evaluation system that all these conditions are taken into account when measuring the effectiveness of a teacher?

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Annette Evans January 21, 2013, 3:32 PM

Because Mayor Bloomberg was unwilling to negotiate a routine teacher evaluation agreement, Governor Cuomo wants to withhold educational funds.

Thereby punishing the children.

I don't know which one is worse.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Katherine Horejsi January 23, 2013, 7:53 PM

Many evaluations are useless and because the results they produce are meaningless. I was just asked to fill out a survey at my kid's middle school. One single question addressed teacher quality? Were we as parents very satisfied, satisfied, unsatisfied, very unsatisfied--One question? Hello, my kid has six different teachers!

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Edgar Ortiz February 1, 2013, 9:39 AM

True there are a few teachers that don't teach well, and there are many people in the world that don't do their job well. A manner to evaluate everyone in whatever they do has to be done, but fairly. A parent who spends hours trying to teach their child reading and math is part of being a parent. If you spend hours teaching your child, then imagine how can a teacher do that, they have 30 kids in a class, they set the lesson and kids who don't get it, that is where a parent steps in. Kids who don't get it must have the parent help. The city cannot afford to spend millions on teachers aids to help those kids who just don't get it because a parent is in denial that they child is not up to the grade level. Parent must help. Parents who don't, are the ones who are in denial, and are too lazy, and expect and blame a teacher on a problem with their child. I love it, parent spends 4 hours on homework, why 4 hours, because, her kids have learning problems. I had sons, one was easy, the other was smart but lazy, we worked hard to make sure he kept up in school, we understood the teacher could not spend that kind of time making sure he kept up. All we asked of the teacher to inform us of any problem with him keeping up so we could work on our problem, not hers. Bottom line, parents help the teachers by understanding that not every child can keep up with the class.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Starr Sackstein February 5, 2013, 5:56 PM

The same way we complain about the value of testing measures for students, teachers need to evaluated organically too. There is no simple way to do it. It will take time to make it meaningful.

There should be several observations with immediate feedback and recommendation and praise with not just assistent principal and principal but intervisitiation or outsiders who don't the teachers so that objectivity can play into the equation.

The measure and standards for which we are being evaluated need to be made clear before being assessed to eliminate the "gotcha" mentality. Transparency is key.

There needs to be flexibility to account for individual teachers and their success based on their own personality. Not a cookie cutter, everyone should be doing the "workshop model" everyday mentality for example.

I wouldn't be opposed to parents having a voice in this process too as theirs is an important voice a child's education and relationships build between schools and families are essential to whole student/person success.

Students should be allowed a voice as well... they are, afterall, who we serve as teachers. If we are truly catering to them in a multifaceted, differentiated way, we shouldn't fear their feedback, we should welcome it.

Maybe the final piece is portfolio - maybe teachers should put together a portfolio of best practices/lessons/assignments - examples of student exemplars on those assignments - examples of feedback and assessment measures as well as self-reflective pieces. Parental outreach and professional development measures should be in there too.

Add Reply
Add a Response
SchoolBook Bulletin Board
Welcome to SchoolBook

Schoolbook is a site dedicated to news, data and conversation about schools in New York City.

Have a News Tip?

Tell us what’s going on in your school. You can e-mail us with your tips or documents, or call 646-801-9698 and leave a voice message.

Contribute to Current & Future News Coverage

Join the Public Insight Network and help our journalists cover education in the city. Your stories and insights can help us create relevant and distinctive reporting. Join more than 100,000 people and become a trusted source.