News, data and conversation
about schools in New York City.
WNYC’s participation is supported by

Should schools be allowed to choose their own school support networks?

Schoolbook-50 SchoolBook Editors October 25, 2012, 7:28 PM

The current school networks which cluster schools based on areas of expertise or instructional philosophy to share training and peer support came under fire at a City Council hearing. Critics said the new structure did not effectively support school leaders. Many said they preferred the old model of clustering schools according to geography.
But Shael Polakow-Suransky, the city's chief academic officer, defended the networks, as he did in this Viewpoint.
What do you think? Revert to a district-based system of peer schools or stick with the current model?

Report as Inappropriate
Question
Respond
Picture?type=square
Matthew Levey October 27, 2012, 3:08 AM

I participated on at least one principal hiring committee (C-30) where it was clear the network leader was pushing a specific candidate.

the hire was good, and the candidate is working out pretty well. But the district superintendant was clearly not empowered to lead the process.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Valarie LaMour October 26, 2012, 2:02 PM

Schools should not be allowed to choose their own network. From my understanding, and experience networks that interfere or challenge a principals agenda are changed within the year. So if something is not working at a school or a complaint actually makes it up the ladder to the said network, a principal could just switch networks to one that is less supervisory. It's like picking your own boss and being able to fire your boss because you don't like what they have to say or tell you what your are not doing correctly. There is no accountability with this system. When the "buck stopped" with the Superintendent conflicts were easier to resolve. This system is a waste of tax payer money by having "managers" not manage but placate to keep networks and paychecks to said networks up and running.

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Leonie Haimson October 26, 2012, 3:33 PM

This is a good piece; thanks! Of all the terrible decisions DOE has made, the incoherent, wasteful, and unaccountable network structure will be the easiest for the next Mayor to undo; let's hope s/he does!

Add Reply
Picture?type=square
Lisa Donlan October 26, 2012, 8:58 PM

I do wish folks would stop repeating this canard, or at least back it up:
"Schools are no longer clustered according to geography. Instead, they elect to join networks organized around an instructional philosophy or particular area of expertise.'
First the networks were crated in spped dating forums and information fairs.
Even back in 2007 some networks were the cool kids in the lunchroom and others were the left overs, left behind and forced to network by some other affiliation- like from the same Leadership Academy class- or the ability to form an ESO ( not an option for all schools, BTW) or mere chance...
Fast forward 5 years as things morph, in the dark, and tell me now, please, just how many networks are organized around pedagogy or expertise or ANYTHING!

Add Reply
Add a Response
SchoolBook Bulletin Board
Welcome to SchoolBook

Schoolbook is a site dedicated to news, data and conversation about schools in New York City.

Have a News Tip?

Tell us what’s going on in your school. You can e-mail us with your tips or documents, or call 646-801-9698 and leave a voice message.

Contribute to Current & Future News Coverage

Join the Public Insight Network and help our journalists cover education in the city. Your stories and insights can help us create relevant and distinctive reporting. Join more than 100,000 people and become a trusted source.